Zoom, zoom, zoom...
Again, although this may seem like an NFL-related post, it does transcend the football base in which it is steeped. Maybe not quite as far reaching implications as my sideline photographer post, but still and all the same.
Nike Corporation
One Bowerman Drive
Beaverton, OR 97005
attn: Marketing and Promotions Department
To Whom it May Concern:
I understand you have a new product in your Nike Zoom line and, as such, you have a desire to market it in the most effective way possible. Being Nike, a good way to do this is to imply speed. Due to this rationale, I completely understand why you would choose LaDainian Tomlinson, running back for the San Diego Chargers and the NFL's top rusher in 2006, as your spokesman. Who better than one of the fastest and most effective runners in the NFL to carry your new line of Zoom products to the top, right? And who better to show him running against than one of the most brutal defenses in the NFL?
And you even came up with a very well-shot commercial to illustrate this point...
However, as someone who is employed in a marketing and promotions capacity as a working-world professional, I must question the mindset of those behind this commercial.
Your goal is to maximize the number of people who respond positively to this commercial so you should be trying to not offend current or potential customers.
So why in the name of all that's holy would you air a commercial in Chicagoland featuring some guy juking out each member of and then scoring against OUR HOME TEAM, THE CHICAGO BEARS???
Whose head was up whose ass when you decided the best way to get through to the Chicago market -- the third largest city with one of the largest suburban constituencies in the United States -- was by showing Tomlinson beat up our home team's defense? The defense that made it to the Super Bowl last year while LaDainian and his Chargers did not. Yeah, we lost, but that's another point altogether. At least we were there.
Admittedly, not everyone in Chicago is a Bears fan. There are pockets of Indy fans down in the southeast, some St. Louis fans in the southwest, and, God forbid, some Green Bay fans in the north (allowing them to live here is simply a charitable act by very forgiving people). But a good 90% of Chicago-based NFL fans are, in fact, Bears fans. Don't ask where that statistic came from, just accept it.
In closing, I'd like to say that you should think before you distribute your commercials next time. Yeah, no matter what, we'd still see it thanks to the wonder that is the Web and, more specifically, YouTube. But at least it wouldn't seem so brazen.
Sincerely,
Kevin "Quite Content with my New Balance Shoes, Thank You Very Much" Apgar
Yikes - I think that if commercials were putting the smack on my beloved Eagles I would have to cause a ruckus!!
Posted by: Bre | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 07:26 AM
Blah blah, football, something...*shoes*? (ears perk up)
;)
Posted by: diane | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 09:48 AM
"Don't ask where that statistic came from, just accept it." I love that line the best.
We have some Packers fans in our neighborhood. It makes my husband crazy during football season to see their signs up.
Posted by: tori | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 11:05 AM
You make some very good points about the Nike ad. Are you going to send it to them? You should.
Posted by: balde50 | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 11:45 AM
I see that Diane read the same thing that I did.
Posted by: Dagny | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 01:24 PM
Bre, you get exactly what I mean! Thank you!
Diane and Dagny, be fair! I told you all it wasn't just about football. It's about bad marketing practices. That's gotta be better than nada, right?
tori, yeah, had to cover myself with that stat disclaimer. And tell your hubby I'm right there with him proudly waving my orange and blue! Da Bears!
balde50, perhaps I will.
Posted by: kapgar | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 05:28 PM
I'm thinking it's better than airing the previously filmed Mike Vick commercial in Atlanta! Your thoughts?
Posted by: B- | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 05:49 PM
Did it involve dogs? ;-)
Posted by: kapgar | Monday, 06 August 2007 at 07:51 PM
Yes, but it made you take notice, didn't it? I think it's brilliant ;)
Hahah, am I forever banned from your blog now?
Posted by: August | Wednesday, 08 August 2007 at 06:01 AM
August, oh it did. But not in the way that Nike hopes. I won't buy a product that insults my tastes. Nike did just that. Imagine if he were running through the Browns defense. Oh, and I would never ban you! ;-)
Posted by: kapgar | Wednesday, 08 August 2007 at 06:29 AM