I don't understand something. Studio photography back in the day at places like the venerated Olan Mills was expensive but not outrageous. And there were some high cost items and processes involved in the, er, process. 

I mean the time and chemicals needed to do it all were  pretty excessive. 

So why now, in the era of digital photography where everything is film- and chemical-free and takes zero time, does a studio shoot cost so damn much?

Yesterday, we went to do a long-overdue shoot for Nathan. About a dozen or so photos and the compilation of some quick specialty variations and being shown all the options, the price tag (before discounts and coupons and memberships were taken off the cost) would have been nearly $550.

What we wanted was far less expensive but the cost is completely unjustified, IMHO. 

Can you possibly explain this to me?

The photos turned out great, though. Here are a few. 




Previous Post


Jun 29
Have I ever told you about my Darth Maul'd Mickey Mouse figure? No? First, by "Darth Maul'd," I mean that the poor guy was halved at the waist just like Darth Maul at the end of his battle with Obi-Wan...
Next Post


Jul 1
I know, I know... I still owe y'all a video for the month of June. I've got one envisioned and even have some of the source video. I just haven't gotten to work editing it. While I work at getting...


You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Kevin Spencer

Those pics are just fantastic. But holy trousers $550?


Right? I can't imagine the justification for that cost.

And thanks, too!

The comments to this entry are closed.